Credentialing Bill Seeks to Prevent Care Delays and Reduce Physician Hassles

Physicians, especially those entering medical practice for the first time, find themselves unable to treat privately insured patients until they have become fully credentialed by insurance companies—a lengthy and oftentimes frustrating process that creates administrative hassles and delays patient care.

Strongly supported by the Pennsylvania Medical Society (PAMED), House Bill 1551 would help streamline the physician credentialing process by requiring insurers to:

  • Complete the credentialing process within 60 days of receipt of a complete application
  • Notify physicians of any missing or incomplete information within five days of receiving their application
  • Indicate their intent to continue processing a physician’s application
  • Allow those physicians who have been notified that their credentialing process will continue to see patients 15 calendar days after their application was received
  • Provide physicians with the application receipt date and meeting date of the health plan’s next credentialing review committee

There is similar bill, Senate Bill 1224, in the Senate.

Contact your legislators and ask them to vote “yes” on HB 1551 or SB 1224 when either bill comes up for a vote in their chamber. If you had a negative and frustrating experience throughout the credentialing process, please be sure to share your story in your message.

“What we currently have is a private health insurance credentialing system or process that is at best inefficient, blind to the needs of patients residing in rural and underserved areas, and unfair to newly trained physicians who simply want to begin putting into practice the skills they have learned during nearly a decade of training,” said Bruce MacLeod, MD, vice president of the Pennsylvania Medical Society (PAMED), in his testimony before the House Insurance Committee on Nov. 30, 2011.

“I should also point out that the system is no kinder to established physicians who change employers or relocate and must similarly jump through and over an insurer’s hoops and hurdles with denying care to patients in need,” said Dr. MacLeod.

In addition to easing the burden on physicians, passage of this legislation would also help ensure access to care for Pennsylvanians and reduce patients’ out-of-pocket expenses.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 8


It would seem logical to force physicians and insurance companies and employers to use a common source so that credentials would be automatically be up dated and held in one place.(CAQH comes to mind)

henry m mueller at 12/2/2011 7:24:49 AM


There should be a monetary penalty for insurance companies who dont use the CAQH credentialing system. They are going to penalize physicians who dont use EMR, so why not keep the same rules for the insurers!

Amit Nahata, MD at 12/1/2011 9:14:34 PM


Sounds good. Our primary care group just took a new physician and credentialling was a total nightmare with some insurances (including federal programs) noting that they had up to 180 days to credential the physician. Primary care is hurting in providing services in rural area and this just causes difficulties which should be eliminated by the bill (if it actually is passed).

anonymous at 12/1/2011 3:40:31 PM


I am literally doing a happy dance at this very moment - as I am in the middle of filling out about 20 enrollment applications for a new physician recruit. How wonderful would it be to have one universal application and one signature page accepted by all PA payors??! But until then, this is a great start! Fingers crossed that this passes!

anonymous at 6/9/2011 4:57:58 PM


I think this is a good plan. They also need to incorporate that the insurance companies must utlize CAQH as a central repository for credentialing information. So many times I send the same information to different insurances for one provider with the insurance company requiring differently formatted forms. Let's use the slogan "minimize and simplify".

anonymous at 6/9/2011 9:47:38 AM


I think this is a good plan. They also need to incorporate that the insurance companies must utlize CAQH as a central repository for credentialing information. So many times I send the same information to different insurances for one provider with the insurance company requiring differently formatted. Let's use the slogan "minimize and simplify".

anonymous at 6/9/2011 9:46:48 AM


I think this is a good plan. They also need to incorporate that the insurance companies must utlize CAQH as a central repository for credentialing information. So many times I send the same information to different insurances for one provider on differently formatted forms are web forms.

anonymous at 6/9/2011 9:30:48 AM


WOW! It is about time. Insurance companies not holding up when a doctor can start working, especially in this day and age of physician shortage, is a step in the right direction that this state needs. A group can't afford to write off services because paperwork isn't processed in time for a doctor's app to go to that month's committee meeting. Worse case, patients, can't afford to pay more because an application isn't approved yet or wait to make an appt with a doctor because it isn't approved. Patients may not be aware or understand there is a whole credentialing process and a doctor who has earned his/her medical degree, completed an internship, residency, even a fellowship, obtained a license, DEA, etc can't go out and automatically see patients for in-network status without going through this process. GOOD LUCK with the Ins. Co. lobbyists! How about having the credentialing application, restrictions on how early you're allowed to submit an app, attachments, etc be the same for all insurances. It's getting better...but this would make it easier and quicker too!

anonymous at 6/8/2011 9:22:35 PM

Last Updated: 2/29/2012
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: