Delegates Enthusiastic About New PAMED Blueprint for Change

From the outset, it was not “business as usual” at the Pennsylvania Medical Society’s (PAMED) annual House of Delegates held Oct. 23 and 24, 2010, in Hershey.

The PAMED Board made it clear to the more than 225 physician delegates that they were seeking a major change in direction for the organization to help physicians deal with rapidly accelerating changes in health care delivery. 

“If you can increase your value, you can increase your ability to weather the storm,” Board Chair John J. Pagan explained to the delegates about the Board’s motivation.

That new direction is defined in a strategic goal, aligned with the PAMED 2013 VISION plan, outlined in a “blueprint” document titled, “Get in the Game: Why Physicians Must Engage in this Era of Change.”  The delegates debated the blueprint during a special reference committee on Saturday, Oct. 23.

The blueprint advocates that the PAMED “must position physicians to lead and shape health care delivery to assure that the evolving system provides quality and value.”

While enthusiastically embracing the blueprint, the delegates recommended some refinements. They asked for a comprehensive communication plan to get the message to all members, and to all Pennsylvania physicians.  To communicate effectively, they asked that PAMED seek a consensus on the definitions of key terms, including “engagement,” “leadership,” “value,” and “quality.”

Newly inaugurated PAMED President Ralph Schmeltz, MD, recommended two refinements:  that PAMED define the new skill sets that physicians will need as the practice of medicine evolves, and collaborate with other health care stakeholders in an open, agile, fashion.

A key message of the blueprint focuses on supporting physicians in all settings.  The delegates agreed that no single clinical integration and or collaboration model is inherently better able to deliver quality and value than any other, and that a variety of such models should have the opportunity to thrive. 

This includes group practices, contractual partnerships linking physicians and other health care providers, physician organizations, physician-hospital joint ventures, and physician employment by health systems.

The Medical Students Section was particularly supportive of the new direction, and added a sixth principle to the blueprint, that “Physician engagement in the future is dependent on student engagement now.”  The MSS recommended that PAMED invest in mentorship, leadership development, and educational opportunities for students as an essential element of the plan.

The delegates agreed that PAMED should direct resources toward physician education on utilizing using data and on understanding the political process.

The next steps in the implementation plan for the blueprint will include continued call for feedback from members, and regional meetings to gather input and spark collaborations.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 2


The business and sports lingo are off-putting. A typical short-term profit-driven business defines "quality" and "value" as "quickest/cheapest" without attention to long-term issues or particularly investing in the emotional health of the customer, which is not considered an important outcome. Medicine is not a business. It is a ministry. I hope the PMS will advocate for approaches that preserve our ability to take time to listen to our patients, give them emotional support, help them negotiate bewilderingly complex healthcare options, think "big picture" and "long term," fight crushing unfunded third-party mandates that distract us from actual patient care, appreciate that one size does not fit all and that each patient is an individual for whom all the statistically proven best-evidence data in the world may not make sense, and--please--balance relentless business-model imposition with personal, conscientious, thorough, compassionate ministry that makes for the best medicine (no matter what business-model customer surveys about on-time performance and 24/7 service suggest.)

Lisa A. Pawelski, MD at 11/4/2010 5:05:14 PM


I hope this doesn't mean that the PMS is going in the direction of the AMA to be a "player" in centrally controlled medicine instead of opposing it. I dropped out of AMA after 35 years because of this.

Anthony Perry, MD at 11/4/2010 4:03:43 PM

Last Updated: 1/9/2012
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: