Bill Would Overhaul Health Insurance Provider Contracting

A bill has been introduced in the state House of Representatives that would overhaul and standardize contracting between physicians and insurers. 

House Bill 1759 would afford physicians more protection during and after contract negotiations by:  

  • Requiring full disclosure of fee schedules, payment policies, and other contract provisions
  • Regulating rental networks or silent PPOs
  • Limiting retrospective audits to six months
  • Requiring insurers to notify contracting physicians when contracts change
  • Defining medical necessity of health services
  • Creating medical policy development standards 

In silent PPO arrangements, an insurer sells or rents its network to a third party that takes advantage of discounts the insurer negotiated with the physician. 

"Legislation is needed to correct an unfair balance of power that works in favor of insurers. This bill would treat both parties as equals in the contractual relationship," said Daniel J. Glunk, MD.  

Dr. Glunk is president of the Pennsylvania Medical Society, which has long advocated for improvements in insurance contracting. 

Some of these protections were granted in the recent settlements with the Blues insurers, but they only apply for generally a four-year period. 

By reducing administrative hassles for medical practices, HB 1759 also would help bring down health care costs in Pennsylvania. 

A typical medical practice contracts with a dozen or more health insurers and must contend with each insurer's way of contracting, credentialing, preauthorizing, coding, billing, and reimbursing.  

"This administrative redundancy and unnecessary complexity is a major source of waste, diverting billions of dollars each year from patient care," Dr. Glunk said. 

Contact your legislators to support HB 1759. Use Capwiz to find your legislators.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 1


I am an owner of a medical account auditing company based in NJ. I intend to help medical providers recover funds from insurance companies/TPAs in the state of PA. I am very interested in the outcome of HB 1759, as I imagine any medical provider in the state is as well. The original wording of the Bill indicated there would be a limit on retrospective audits to 180 days. Thus, allowing underpayments unintentional or not to become "paid in full" as of day 181. This limitation would not hinder anyone such as a silent PPO from practicing their healthcare payer fraud against hospitals and physicians! Medical offices are already understaffed, which has been a main contributing cause that helped silent PPO activity to grow. Silent PPO activty has had roughly 20 YEARS of free-reign defrauding medical providers out of their rightful due! Why shinder them again by limiting their chance to discover missing funds to 180 days!!!?? FRAUD shouldnt pay!...EVER!

Making it right at 4/22/2010 2:51:02 PM

Last Updated: 8/6/2009
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: