Bill to Incorporate HIV Testing into Routine Medical Care Becomes Law

Legislation that incorporates HIV testing into routine medical care was signed into law by Gov. Tom Corbett on July 7, 2011.

Act 59 (formerly SB 260), introduced by Sen. Ted Erickson (R-Delaware), will update state law so it is consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations that everyone between the ages of 13 and 64 should be tested for HIV as part of routine care. Although the CDC updated its guidelines in 2006, Pennsylvania law still requires a separate signed consent for HIV testing in conjunction with pre- and post-test counseling.

Under the new law, physicians may offer opt-out HIV testing, as long as the patient is informed that they will be tested for HIV, unless the patient refuses. Physicians must document the provision of informed consent, including pre-test information, and whether the patient declined the offer of HIV-testing.

Written “opt out” consent will still be required for those individuals who do not wish to be tested for HIV. Those who do not oppose HIV screening as part of their routine care will no longer required to sign a consent for such screening, nor will the physician be required to provide pre-test counseling. 

There are some post-test counseling requirements in the new law, so physicians should familiarize themselves with the legislation before initiating the streamlined process.

This legislation is all about early detection, education, and treatment. Of course, it is also about stopping the spread of a communicable and treatable disease. In fact, according to the CDC, perinatal transmissions account for 91 percent of all AIDS cases among children in the United States. Antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy can reduce the transmission rate to 2 percent or less. The transmission rate is 25 percent without treatment.

SB 260 previously passed the House on June 29, 2011, by a vote of 177-24 It was unanimously passed by the Senate in April and received a concurrence vote on a House-added amendment in the Senate on June 30, 2011.

The Pennsylvania Medical Society has long supported this legislation and applauds the representatives and senators who voted in favor of this bill.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 14


******* www.youtube.com/hivquestions ******* the truth about HIV testing and AIDS

obmode at 8/22/2011 2:05:22 AM


Positive results would still be delivered face-to-face to give the patient the immediate opportunity for individual face-face counseling about the results.

PA Medical Society at 7/22/2011 3:03:07 PM


does this bill also remove the requirement of face-to-face notification of HIV testing results?

d scott mccracken md at 7/22/2011 1:58:42 PM


In legislative drafting, brackets around a word or section mean that the words within the brackets are to be removed from existing law. SB 260, now known as Act 59 of 2011, removes the requirement of written consent via that mechanism.

PA Medical Society at 7/11/2011 2:47:52 PM


I read the Senate Bill No. 260 and section 5 still reads,"(1) Except as provided in section 6 with respect to the involuntary testing of a source patient, no HIV-related test shall be performed without first obtaining the informed [written] documented consent of the subject. To me, this still requires written consent, regarless of the Opt out clause.

Dr Bernard Harris at 7/11/2011 10:26:05 AM


Clarify the last sentence above. Opt out of HIV testing only, not routine medical care and HIV testing.

KPS at 5/13/2011 3:46:40 PM


This should have been a requirement for obtaining a marriage license for the past 20 years. In an urban clinic setting it's been a good idea since testing was available. It's required on all immigration exams.

The Clinic at 5/13/2011 2:44:45 PM


Written consent would no longer be required, though consent must be “documented” as part of the “opt out” process.

PAMED at 5/13/2011 1:19:54 PM


Not only good for public health, but also will eliminate barriers to prompt source testing when a healthcare worker sustains a needlestick. Hope the House follows suit quickly - can't be too soon for me.

Atwell MD at 5/13/2011 12:29:27 PM


Bravo..a welcome move.

Abhishek at 5/12/2011 11:17:27 PM


I hope the house passes the SB260.It would remove an unnecessary obstacle in the path to optimal patient care. It never made any sense to me that we are not required to obtain a special consent to perform RPR on a patient but must obtain cumbersome consent to be able to order HIV testing !

Anil P at 5/12/2011 10:44:57 PM


So does this include the key provision of removing written consent? it is not clearly stated above.

Dr J Kirchner at 5/12/2011 5:57:15 PM


Excellant move!! HIV should not be treated any different than other Infectious Diseases.

Hema Kapoo MD D(ABMM) at 5/12/2011 5:24:10 PM


Long overdue

Moyer at 5/12/2011 3:14:25 PM

Last Updated: 8/17/2011
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: