CMS Eases Meaningful Use Requirements for EHR Bonuses

Medicare has announced final standards and measures for “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHR) that medical practices must meet to receive payment bonuses beginning in 2011.   

To qualify in 2011 and 2012, medical practices will have to meet 15 core requirements as well as five additional measures selected from a menu of 10 measures. Additional rules will be released for the remaining years of the incentive payments. 

The original rule would have required physicians to meet 25 objectives over a 90-day reporting period in 2011, but the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) received many comments that meeting all of these objectives was too “demanding and inflexible,” wrote David Blumenthal, national coordinator for health information technology at the DHHS.  

To qualify for incentives, practices also will have to attest that they are using a certified EHR and specify which system they are using.  

Practices also will have to report on three quality measures in 2011 and 2012—blood pressure level, tobacco status, and adult weight screening and follow-up. 

Listed below are the measures that must be met by individual providers. Different measures apply to hospitals.

Meaningful Use Objectives

Core objective 

Measure

Record patient demographics (sex, race, ethnicity, date of birth, and preferred language) For more than 50 percent of patients
Record vital signs and chart changes for height, weight, blood pressure, body mass index, and growth charts for children Height, weight, and blood pressure for at least 50 percent of patients 2 years or older
Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses At least one entry for at least 80 percent of patients
Maintain active medication list At least one entry for at least 80 percent of patients
Maintain active medication allergy list At least one entry for at least 80 percent of patients
Record smoking status for patients 13 years old and older For at least 50 percent of patients 13 years old and older
Provide patients with clinical summaries for each office visit Provided within three business days for at least 50 percent of all office visits
On request, provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information, including diagnostic test results, problem list, medication list, and medication allergies More than 50 percent of requesting patients receive electronic copy within three business days
Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically At least 40 percent are electronically submitted
Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication orders More than 30 percent of patients with at least one medication on their list have one medication ordered through CPOE
Implement drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks Enable functionality for these checks for the entire reporting period
Electronically exchange clinical information among provider and patient-authorized entities Perform at least one test of EHR capacity to electronically exchange information
Implement at least one decision support rule, along with the ability to track compliance with those rules One clinical decision support rule implemented
Protect privacy and security of patient data in the EHR Conduct or review a security risk analysis, implement security updates as necessary, and correct identified security deficiencies
Report clinical quality measures to CMS or state For 2011, physician can attest in writing that measure has been achieved; for 2012, electronically submit measures

Menu of objectives (pick five)

Measure

Implement drug formulary checks Drug formulary check implemented and has access to at least one internal or external drug formulary for entire reporting period
Incorporate clinical laboratory test results More than 40 percent of clinical laboratory test results are in positive/negative or numerical format
Generate list of patients by specific condition to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research, or outreach Generate at least one listing
Use EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those to the patient Provide to more than 10 percent of patients
Perform medication reconciliation between care settings For more than 50 percent of transitions of care
Provide summary of care record for patients referred or transitioned to another provider/setting For more than 50 percent of patient transitions or referrals
Submit electronic immunization data to immunization data registries or immunization information systems Perform at least one test of data submissions and follow-up submission
Submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies Perform at least one test of data submission and follow-up submission
Send reminders to patients for preventive and follow-up care For more than 20 percent of patients 65 years of age and older or five years of age and younger
Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information (laboratory results, problem list, medication list, medication allergies) Provide electronic access to more than 10 percent of patients within four days of it being updated in the EHR

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 16


Are any practices using non liscense personnel , such as medical assistance, to entry permissible electronic prescriptions per the physician's order? If so, how are you meeting the standard that states liscense personnel? How can practices compete and afford liscense staff to meet the objective?

Anonymous at 3/19/2012 9:27:57 PM


In the Menu of Objectives, when sending reminders to patients are both preventive and followup care criteria required? Our practice only sends reminders for followup care. The delineation I saw states "patient preference."

anonymous at 8/9/2010 6:55:29 AM


In a few words the intent is admirable, the reality is unlikely that the majority of physicians will be able to comply especially if one is in traditional private practice and in underserved regions.

Eugene A. Scioscia Jr. MD at 8/6/2010 11:32:56 AM


Regarding hardship exemption: Under current law, EMRs are not mandated. Physicians who do not successfully meet the meaningful use criteria by 2015 will be penalized 1% of their Medicare payments. There is a hardship exemption. However, it is not clearly defined. The law simply states that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will consider such requests. We expect that we will have more details as we approach 2015.

PA Medical Society at 8/5/2010 4:19:29 PM


Actually, in response to the comment on race, it is very important when screening a patient. Different races have higher instances of some genetic diseases. For example, sickle cell anemia is higher in some races than others. It is not racist.

anonymous at 8/5/2010 4:06:43 PM


@8/5/2010 3:25:56 -- It is not intrinsically racist to record race/ethnicity/language in a dataset. The only way we can combat the pervasive health disparities that already exist in this country along racial and ethnic lines is to measure them. Without identification there is no measurement.

anonymous at 8/5/2010 3:50:03 PM


Where is the hardship exemption that was promised for very small practices? We are a solo doctor Alternative Medicine practice, where most of our patients pay out of pocket, but we still participate in Medicare. Implementing EHR would destroy our practice. We would drop out of Medicare and then retire early before considering EHR. All EHR is doing is forcing small solo practices out of business and merging with large practices that can afford to have a computer specialist on hand. I don't think that was the purpose intended. The benefits of EHR are overshadowed with extra time and stress for physicians. It should be an option, without any mandates.

anonymous at 8/5/2010 3:26:48 PM


The requirement to record race, ethnicity and language especially in digital form is itself RACIST and dangerous. Many countries require such identification, but, so far, not in the US.

anonymous at 8/5/2010 3:25:56 PM


The 3/15 edition of Internal Medicine News has a story entitled "Physicians Might Not Embrace Incentives for Health IT". The deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society is quoted "I think (federal officials) are risking failure because doctors will say, 'Are you kidding? I don't want to have anything to do with this.'." .... He says, "A couple of years ago, personal health records.. were the talk of the town...." ... but that hasn't happened.."Personal Health Records landed with a thud. We need to figure out that sometimes we have to keep it simple" In an editorial in the same issue, a family physician who recently bought into EHR now calls it "The Grand Illusion". He says "paper is cheap, reliable, secure and firmly established. EHRs are new and exciting but expensive in time and money, and of unproven value. Think long and hard before you commit the time and investment to buying a system.

anonymous at 4/2/2010 4:31:05 PM


I am an Alternative Medicine physician. I try to get people off of additive pain medications and I don't prescribe much. I don't participate with private insurance because they don't pay for my main services. However, I do participate with Medicare, but that might end (if there are any mandates for me) because none of the above applies to me. I only have 2 staff members and everything works just fine as is, doing most things manually. None of the above would be of benefit to my patients. The Govt. is supposed to be providing funding to build a workforce to increase the number of doctors to keep up with the anticipated increase in number of patients. Instead, the above seems to be a prescription to discourage anyone from being a physician.

anonymous at 3/24/2010 12:14:40 AM


I agree that many of the proposed meaningful use measures are more appropriate to PCPs and medicine specialists than they are to surgeons. To qualify for incentives under the proposed rule, all physicians must comply with all 25 of the meaningful use measures. However, we believe that some of the proposed measures will be changed in the final rule. Stay tuned…

Darlene Kauffman, PAMED Staff at 3/19/2010 4:16:10 PM


The Progressive Physician has a story where a Computer Glitch had forced the shutdown of the VA’s Defense Dept. electronic health record system due to errors in patient’s medical data that clinicians downloaded from the Defense network. The only way the errors were discovered was when someone noticed that an erectile dysfunction drug was prescribed to a female patient. The director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health at the FDA said that during the past 2 years, system vendors reported 260 system malfunctions that caused 44 injuries and six deaths. http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20100304_9977.php?oref=topstory Imagine the difficulty of a small solo-physician practice, being handed these responsibilities with one medical assistant and 1 receptionist. It could destroy many practices. Maybe people should think twice before proceeding, since this was all rushed through with debate during the financial meltdown 1 year ago.

anonymous at 3/17/2010 2:46:48 PM


As a general surgeon, my practice is primarily a referral practice with very few long-term patients. Most of the above objectives are not applicable to this type of practice. What measures are referral-type practices required to meet?

anonymous at 3/14/2010 12:22:41 PM


Thanks for the effort of the PA Medical Society in trying to remove any mandates/penalties, especially for small healthcare practices. Is there any way for physicians (individually or as a group) to write to the office of EHR Czar David Blumenthal or his superiors and voice our displeasure? The ACP was requesting input at this time so I thought you might have more direct contact information. There has already been an extensive study indicating that EHR doesn't save $, but even if it did, it would be at the expense of physician's time : http://www.theprogressivephysician.com/practice-management/study-electronic-patient-records-show-minimal-benefit.html Physicians will be at even more of a shortage under Obamacare, so making matters worse by imposing mandates that would upset most physicians and make personal family care more difficult, does not seem wise. For example one patient of ours, who is a retired physician, was quite upset when during his visit to his specialist, the doctor didn't even look up from his computer during the entire encounter!! Another study from the Progressive Physician reveals that patient demand for having access to their own electronic medical records online is declining after initial interest. Some sites are being shut down due to lack of interest. It makes much more sense to encourage patients to keep their own important medical records at the time of their diagnostic tests.

anonymous at 3/9/2010 3:06:52 PM


The Society is very aware of the challenges that physicians face in implementing an electronic health record system. We currently are working with federal and state regulators to ease this burden by promoting a less aggressive time frame for implementation with little or no penalties.

PA Medical Society at 3/8/2010 4:25:40 PM


Our solo doctor practice is against any mandates for EHR. We would drop out of Medicare and then retire before being subjected to any mandates. By mandates we mean having reimbursements cut or denied at some point, if we didn't subscribe to EHR or if we were no longer allowed to submit medical records or billing to medicare or other providers via regular mail (but had to use disk or electronic submissions only.) One marketer of EHR software wrote that we could be denied Malpractice Insurance at some point in the future if we didn't have EHR. It appears that pressure is being put on practices to make life much more complicated by denying the right of physicians to continue using simple hand written notes, etc., etc. Practices are getting merged into larger (less personal) practices because of the perception of these added requirements. There may no longer be a simple solo-practitioner (unless they could afford the cost and space of 7 staff members) if this continues without physicians being allowed to fight back. We were told last year that there would be "hardship" exemptions, but no details were known at that time. When the stimulus package was passed, noone had an opportunity to debate specifics or limitations. Since that time there still hasn't been an opportunity to voice displeasure to the Administration in Washington. Are the hardship cases now available and is our voice going to be heard in Washington?

anonymous at 3/4/2010 3:46:58 PM

Last Updated: 7/15/2010
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: